The European Union’s recent agreement with Egypt, valued at 7.4 billion euros, has drawn sharp criticism from the EU rights watchdog, raising concerns about potential human rights violations. This pact, primarily aimed at curtailing migrant flows into Europe, has ignited fears over the compromise of fundamental rights.
Pressure is mounting on the European Commission to prioritize human rights considerations in its dealings with partner countries, especially those involving measures to deter irregular migration. Commission President Ursula von der Leyen sealed the deal in Cairo, allocating 200 million euros specifically for migration management. However, similar agreements with countries like Mauritania, Tunisia, and Turkey since 2016 have faced staunch opposition from rights organizations.
Human Rights Watch denounced the agreement with Egypt as “cash-for-migration-control,” accusing it of bolstering authoritarianism. EU Ombudsperson Emily O’Reilly echoed these concerns, emphasizing transparency in fund utilization to ensure accountability.
While the Commission emphasizes the integration of human rights into EU-Egypt relations since the Association Agreement in 2004, critics highlight Egypt’s track record of repressing freedoms. They fear the deal may worsen the plight of migrants and refugees.
A key objective of the partnership is to deter Egyptian nationals and other migrants from using Egypt as a transit point to Europe. Economic motives drive a surge in Egyptians attempting the perilous Mediterranean crossing.
Apprehensions also arise regarding the fate of refugees and asylum seekers in Egypt under the new deal amidst resource constraints and hostile attitudes towards migrants. Concerns intensify for Sudanese refugees, urging the EU to establish a robust asylum system.
Experts doubt the effectiveness of EU resources in improving refugee conditions, warning of heightened risks and increased fatalities during perilous migrant journeys. The agreement sparks debates on the ethical implications of border management strategies amid migration control and regional stability concerns.