A heated debate has emerged among European Union lawmakers over a new migration policy that would allow member states to set up migrant return hubs outside EU borders.
The proposal, approved on March 26, would see rejected asylum seekers transferred to facilities in third countries while they wait to be returned to their countries of origin. Supporters believe the move could fix long-standing gaps in the EU’s migration system.
Among those backing the policy is Lena Düpont, a member of the centre-right European People’s Party. She described the plan as an important step forward, arguing that while the EU has invested heavily in asylum systems, it still lacks an effective way to return migrants who have no legal right to stay.
She pointed out that only about 20 percent of migrants ordered to leave the EU are actually returned, stressing that a stronger return system is necessary to improve migration management.
However, the proposal has faced strong opposition from Juan Fernando López Aguilar of the Socialists & Democrats group. He warned that setting up return hubs outside the EU could put migrants at risk, as such centres may not fully respect fundamental human rights.
He also raised concerns that migrants placed in these hubs could fall outside the protection of EU laws, making oversight and accountability more difficult.
The disagreement highlights a growing divide within the European Parliament, with some lawmakers pushing for stricter migration controls while others emphasize the need to protect human rights.
Critics also argue that the policy reflects a broader shift toward tougher migration measures in Europe, with increasing support from right-leaning political groups.
As discussions continue, the debate over migrant return hubs is expected to remain a key issue in shaping the future of EU migration policy.