A recent case has raised questions after a migrant who committed a crime was given £500 to leave the UK. The man, Hadush Kebatu, had been released from HMP Chelmsford by mistake instead of being transferred to immigration detention. After a two-day search, he was found in London and later deported to Ethiopia. The payment sparked confusion and criticism, as many people questioned why someone being removed from the country would receive money.
According to the Home Office, the payment was an “operational decision” to prevent delays and extra costs. Officials explained that if the man had refused to board the flight, the government might have needed to arrange another deportation flight, additional guards, and more detention time. These costs could have been far higher than the £500 offered.
The UK has an existing scheme that allows foreign offenders to leave the country voluntarily. This program, known as the Facilitated Return Scheme, has been in place since 2006. It encourages people who have been convicted of crimes to return to their home countries without lengthy legal battles or expensive imprisonment.
So why are some migrants paid up to £3,000 to leave the country?
Migrants who have not committed crimes but are living in the UK without legal status can apply for Voluntary Return through the Voluntary Returns Service. This support helps them travel, get documents, and settle back in their home country. The goal is to avoid long-term immigration issues and reduce state costs.
Under this scheme, some migrants can receive up to £3,000 to support their move back home. This money can help them with travel, housing, or starting work again in their home country. Payments depend on factors such as whether the person is returning to a developing country, has been refused asylum, or is considered vulnerable.
In the case of Kebatu, he did not qualify for this higher amount because his removal was enforced and not voluntary. However, officials still provided a smaller payment to avoid further delays and risks. The government said this was the cheaper and faster solution.
This situation has led to public debate. Some argue that the payments help reduce long legal and detention costs. Others believe offenders should not receive money at all. The discussion continues as the UK reviews immigration enforcement and voluntary return policies.