The Trump administration is exploring new ways to carry out migrant deportations by negotiating with countries like Angola and Equatorial Guinea — nations far from the US and with no ties to the individuals being deported. According to internal government documents, the US is considering sending third-country migrants, including alleged gang members, to these African countries despite their lack of prior connection.
This move is drawing heavy criticism from human rights advocates and legal experts who argue that these deals violate international protection standards and are more about deterring migration than solving immigration challenges. Deporting people to unfamiliar countries may put their safety at risk and raise serious humanitarian questions.
While similar controversial deportation agreements have been made with some Latin American nations, this new shift toward Africa and parts of Europe signals a broader and more aggressive strategy. But so far, African officials appear to be rejecting the idea.
An Angolan official has publicly stated that their country will not accept deportees who are not Angolan nationals. Likewise, a representative from Equatorial Guinea denied any ongoing discussions with the US about such deportation arrangements, contradicting reports circulating from Washington.
Critics argue that such policies create more confusion and instability for migrants and fail to address the root causes of displacement. Legal experts also stress that forced deportations without proper legal pathways or protections could violate both US and international law.
As the Trump administration pursues this approach, pressure is growing from global human rights groups urging the US to rethink its strategy and prioritize lawful, humane immigration solutions.