In a recent development, the Council of State has intervened to suspend the transfer of six patrol boats to the National Guard of Tunisia, following an appeal by several humanitarian organizations. This decision comes after the Regional Administrative Court of Lazio rejected an earlier appeal against the transfer, deeming it compliant with both EU agreements and national laws.
The controversy arose when organizations including Asgi, Arci, ActionAid, Mediterranea Saving Humans, Spazi Circolari, and Le Carbet contested the transfer, citing concerns over human rights implications. They argued that the boats could be used to intercept and deter migrants attempting perilous sea crossings to Europe.
The Lazio court had initially upheld the legality of the agreement, citing the EU-Tunisia Memorandum of July 16, 2023, which outlines cooperation on migration issues, and Tunisia’s recent designation as a safe country of origin by Italy. It affirmed that the Italian government had conducted thorough assessments and emphasized the long-standing partnership between Italy and Tunisia in managing migration flows.
However, the Council of State’s decision reflects a different perspective, prioritizing the protection concerns raised by the appellants. It has temporarily halted the transfer, citing potential risks of human rights violations associated with the use of these patrol boats.
This move underscores ongoing debates within Europe regarding migration policies and the balance between security measures and humanitarian considerations. The outcome of this suspension could impact future collaborations between EU states and North African countries on managing migration and maritime security.
The Council of State’s intervention highlights the complexities involved in international agreements aimed at addressing migration challenges, particularly concerning the ethical and legal implications of security assistance provided to partner countries like Tunisia.