The Italian government’s decision to transfer responsibility for migrant detention validation from the immigration section of the Rome tribunal to appeals courts has sparked a wave of criticism. This policy shift formalized through a November 20 amendment to the immigration flow decree, is anticipated to place overwhelming pressure on appeals courts, already struggling with resource constraints. The National Association of Magistrates (ANM) has expressed grave concerns about the potential impact of this move.
Under the new system, appeals courts will handle over 30,000 cases annually, a sharp increase from their current workload. Judicial leaders warn that the courts lack the necessary staff and resources to meet these demands, which could lead to significant delays. Milan appeals court chief Giuseppe Ondei highlighted that such a burden could jeopardize the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP) targets and slow down rulings on other critical cases.
The judiciary has described this policy as a “disaster foretold,” with appeals court heads raising alarms in a letter to President Sergio Mattarella. Legal experts argue that the government has failed to address how courts will manage the added caseload, potentially compromising the overall efficiency of the justice system. The ANM predicts that appeals courts will be “brought to their knees” by the sheer volume of cases.
Francesco Petrelli, president of the Union of Criminal Chambers, voiced his concerns about the amendment, stating that it could worsen tensions between the judiciary and political authorities. He emphasized that such disagreements should be avoided, especially as Italy’s judicial system undergoes significant reforms. Petrelli believes the new system could exacerbate jurisdictional complexities rather than solve them.
Critics further contend that this shift undermines the original objectives of the government’s flagship Albania migration policy. The amendments appear to prioritize political optics over practical solutions, leaving courts to navigate an unmanageable workload without sufficient resources or structural support. The ripple effects could extend beyond the judiciary, impacting the broader judicial reforms and public confidence in the legal system.
The Italian judiciary is at a crucial point. Without immediate action to increase resources and improve processes, the system could collapse under the added pressure. Experts are urging swift measures to ensure the justice system remains efficient and fair in handling the migration crisis.