Seven migrants from Egypt and Bangladesh who were transferred to Albania last week have been sent back to Italy. This return, which happened early on Tuesday, follows a court decision that halted their detention in Albania. The situation has stirred a debate about Italy’s new approach to processing asylum applications outside its borders.
On November 8, the Italian government had initially sent the migrants to a processing center in Gjader, Albania, as part of a plan to handle asylum claims in countries considered “safe.” However, Italy’s immigration court quickly raised legal concerns about this practice. The case was sent to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) for further review. With no verdict within the required 48 hours, Italy decided to bring the migrants back and process their asylum claims within the country.
This policy, inspired by similar plans in the UK, aims to speed up asylum procedures by using facilities in “safe” countries outside Italy. However, Italian courts have questioned this approach, especially given past ECJ rulings that challenge the validity of designating entire countries as universally safe for all migrants.
Deputy Premier Matteo Salvini criticized the court’s decision, calling it a “political sentence” that opposes government efforts to manage migration. Salvini, known for his firm stance on immigration, promised to take further measures to secure Italy’s borders and uphold its right to enforce immigration laws.
As the ECJ prepares for a crucial ruling on December 4, the question is whether Italy can lawfully send migrants to “safe” countries like Albania. The court’s decision could set new guidelines for Italy’s migrant processing policies and their compliance with EU rules.
Opposition leaders argue that this Albanian plan is ineffective and burdens the Italian government. Debora Serracchiani from the Democratic Party criticized it as causing unnecessary suffering for migrants who face long journeys only to be returned to Italy. Other opposition figures, like Angelo Bonelli of Green Europe, accused the government of escalating tensions with the judiciary over migration, asserting that political motives are driving the policy.
The ongoing debate has made Italy’s migration policies a hot topic in national politics, with both supporters and critics weighing in. Many opponents believe the Albanian plan undermines EU principles and fails to address migration challenges. With the December decision approaching, Italy’s policy on migrant detention remains uncertain as lawmakers and European courts work to balance security with the rights of asylum seekers.