A study conducted by the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW) indicates that extending the waiting period for asylum seekers to access healthcare benefits in Germany, introduced through new legislation in February, does not reduce societal costs. Contrary to policymakers’ expectations, elongating the waiting period from approximately 18 to 36 months is unlikely to curb expenses.
The motive behind this legislative change was to diminish the appeal of Germany to potential asylum seekers and withhold full benefits until individuals have contributed to the public health system. However, the DIW’s study, released on March 20, challenges the effectiveness of this strategy.
The study suggests that delaying access to healthcare could lead to exacerbated health conditions among migrants, ultimately resulting in higher societal costs over time. Louise Biddle, one of the study’s authors, emphasized the importance of addressing health issues promptly, highlighting that postponing treatment often escalates costs.
Under the new laws, asylum seekers in Germany only receive treatment for acute illnesses, pain, or pregnancy during the initial 36 months of their stay, with further treatment subject to the discretion of healthcare providers or social welfare offices.
While the legislation garnered bipartisan support, conservative factions advocated for longer waiting periods to cut costs. Critics argue that such measures may not yield the desired outcomes.
Opposition leader Friedrich Merz’s remarks about migrants benefiting from welfare provisions sparked controversy. They reflect broader debates surrounding the allocation of resources during economic strain.
The DIW study suggests that implementing an electronic health card, already operational in six German states, could enhance transparency and efficiency in healthcare provision. Hamburg, one of the states with electronic cards, reportedly saved 1.6 million euros annually.
The current system, lacking electronic cards, is plagued by administrative complexities, causing delays in treatment and disparities in care provision.
Moreover, the study reveals significant support needs among migrants and asylum seekers, particularly in accessing healthcare, learning the German language, seeking employment, and navigating the asylum process. Despite expressed needs, many individuals report inadequate assistance.
Mentorship programs and enhanced access to information are recommended to facilitate integration and improve support services for migrants.
Another DIW study illuminates the migration routes to Germany, highlighting the challenges migrants face, including negative experiences during transit. To ensure uniform access to healthcare and greater transparency across the system, mitigating discrepancies in treatment and administrative hurdles, electronic health cards are proposed to be implemented nationwide.
As Germany grapples with the implications of migration and seeks to foster integration, addressing healthcare disparities emerges as a critical step toward achieving societal cohesion and equitable access to essential services.